Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > #311724 > > cdbs is an example for this madness (B-D) here, maybe others do it too.
Oh, blech. Yes, I agree this should be prohibited. Never occurred to me to do something like that. I think a suitable substitute would be, instead of generating new Build-Depends, see what you would have generated, and fail if it's not right. That should satisfy anyone who really *wants* a misfeature like this. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
