On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 01:31:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > In what sense is this bug pending? > > > > > In the sense that it is fixed in cvs, which will be version 3.0.24. > > > But 3.0.23 was used for woody and it is possible (likely?) that 3.0.24 > > > will never be released since the debian-installer effort will replace > > > boot-floppies. > > > > Is there any reason that install-doc shouldn't be removed from unstable > > and/or testing, if it's not going to be used for debian-installer? > > The package is useless as it is so nobody would shed a tear for it, but I > don't know if there are any repercussions (or if it's against the etiquette) > if you ditch a binary package but don't adjust the source package it > originates from...
I've noticed that changes to the manual get propagated to the web from CVS, even though it's not 'released'. Removing it from testing / unstable wouldn't affect that, would it? 'Cuz I think that's a good idea. -- Debian GNU/Linux Operating System By the People, For the People Chris Tillman (a people instance)
