-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 01:31:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Is there any reason that install-doc shouldn't be removed from > > > unstable and/or testing, if it's not going to be used for > > > debian-installer? > > > > The package is useless as it is so nobody would shed a tear for it, > > but I don't know if there are any repercussions (or if it's against > > the etiquette) if you ditch a binary package but don't adjust the > > source package it originates from... > > The same reasons to remove install-doc would apply to the whole > boot-floppies source package, wouldn't they? PMJI, but what if the SRM does another point release of woody? Wouldn't install-doc and boot-floppies be kinda necessary?
Joe Nahmias, d-t tester-at-large, DD wannabe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+vn0yKl23+OYWEqURAg93AJ4wT69VS/MNVJZAAPa/toMnXME+XACdGcVw y/oOKVbMDZgY5Yaz8yDYZLg= =KBZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
