On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 09:24:55AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > The package is useless as it is so nobody would shed a tear for it, but I > > don't know if there are any repercussions (or if it's against the etiquette) > > if you ditch a binary package but don't adjust the source package it > > originates from... > > I've noticed that changes to the manual get propagated to the web from > CVS, even though it's not 'released'. Removing it from testing / unstable > wouldn't affect that, would it? 'Cuz I think that's a good idea.
It looks like the web version of the manual was updated on December 18, 2002. With the help of cvs-exp.pl I looked through the changes since that date [1]. There have been a number of documentation and translation updates. One change that sticks out is the new 'nousb' boot option. Since that is documented, and not in 3.0.23, updating the web docs to it without releasing 3.0.24 might not be a good idea. 3.0.24 is full of good fixes, we just need to get the ball rolling and release it, test it. -David [1] http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/boot-floppies-changes
