On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 17:32 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 02:45:37PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 22:45 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > It would be better to have a halfway modern lilypond on 32-bit archs and > > > > nothing at all on 64-bit archs, than to have a medieval lilypond of > > > > them. > > > > So, if that's the case, wouldn't the next step be to file a bug with > > > ftpmaster requesting the removal of the 64-bit builds of the old version > > > of lilypond from testing, after which the new lilypond would propagate to > > > testing automatically since it would no longer be breaking those > > > architectures? > > > s/file a bug with ftpmaster/mail debian-release/ :) > > No, absolutely not. The release team does not remove individual binary > packages, this is the domain of the ftp team.
Ah yes; I must have been thinking of complete package removals and forgotten the distinction wrt partial removals from testing. Apologies for that. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
