* Adam D. Barratt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061203 21:10]: > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 11:15 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Adam D Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 22:45 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > > >> So, if that's the case, wouldn't the next step be to file a bug with > > >> ftpmaster requesting the removal of the 64-bit builds of the old > > >> version of lilypond from testing, after which the new lilypond would > > >> propagate to testing automatically since it would no longer be breaking > > >> those architectures? > > > > > s/file a bug with ftpmaster/mail debian-release/ :) > > > > Oh, I thought ftp-master had to do that. Thank you for the correction! > > ftp-master (at least directly) handle removals from unstable and > experimental. They may well end up involved in removals from other > suites (particularly stable) but generally acting on the request of the > relevant release team or providing tools to allow them to manage things > themselves.
The relevant binary packages are however removed from unstable - and this removal propagates to testing through our normal testing scripts. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
