On Sunday 24 December 2006 00:31, Steve Langasek wrote: > This still does not respect certain local changes by the admin. Just > because the link in /etc/rc2.d has been left alone doesn't mean that the > symlinks for *all* the runlevels have been left alone.
Thats true, but if anybody changed there stuff, he should be able to handle also this. But a hint in NEWS.Debian would be a nice idea. > I'm going ahead with unblocking it anyway; despite being a policy > violation, this package wasn't in sarge so this is not release-critical, > and better to have a policy-violating change before the release than to > have one that impacts users when upgrading from etch to lenny. Thanks, Jan.
pgpzjHLSWrmiS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
