Hi Sylvain, On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:38:20PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> On 14-01-2007, Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello, > > > > I have just uploaded ocamlgsl 0.5.2-1i to unstable. The former version > > (0.5.1-3) has an important bugs, that this new upstream release fix. I > > attach the diff between the two version. > > > > The difference is : > > * Upstream correction of bug (#406711: libocamlgsl-ocaml-dev: undefined > > reference to `ml_gsl_sf_legendre_array_size_e' when building top level > > * Use of ocaml.mk (shipped in ocaml package). > > > > Since the upstream correction solved a bug of severity important i think > > it should be good to correct this for etch. > > > > Dependency in etch are enough for this new package. > As suggested, i have rebuild a package 0.5.2-0etch1 which doesn't have > the "build system maintainance". Now it includes only the new upstream > release. > I would like to upload this package to testing-proposed-update. > Is this OK ? Testing-proposed-updates is intended for RC bugfixes, and definitely not for new upstream releases. If you want to see this fix included in etch, please provide a package via unstable that includes the important bugfixes without the build system reorg, and reintroduce the build system changes after it's been accepted into etch. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
