On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 20:52 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 20:45:10 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:39:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:32:06 +0000, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > > > gnumed-client (0.7.10-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low > > > > . > > > Why does this contain the 0.8.5-1 changelog entry? That looks broken. > > > > Because package version 0.8.5-1 was released previosely and I intended > > to keep a full record of all released packages in the changelog. > > That makes no sense. The 0.7.10-2 package doesn't contain the changes > from 0.8.5-1, why should it contain its changelog?
More to the point, it's going to make the BTS believe that 0.7.10-2 is a direct descendent of 0.8.5-1 and contains any bugs present in the latter version, which is clearly not the case. The previous intermingling of 0.7.10-1 in the unstable changelog is also broken; the packages are not descended from each other, the changelog should not claim that they are. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
