On 12/30/2010 09:11 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 20:52 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 20:45:10 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 08:39:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:32:06 +0000, Andreas Tille wrote: >>>> >>>>> gnumed-client (0.7.10-2) testing-proposed-updates; >>>>> urgency=low . >>>> Why does this contain the 0.8.5-1 changelog entry? That looks >>>> broken. >>> >>> Because package version 0.8.5-1 was released previosely and I >>> intended to keep a full record of all released packages in the >>> changelog. >> >> That makes no sense. The 0.7.10-2 package doesn't contain the >> changes from 0.8.5-1, why should it contain its changelog? > > More to the point, it's going to make the BTS believe that 0.7.10-2 > is a direct descendent of 0.8.5-1 and contains any bugs present in > the latter version, which is clearly not the case. The previous > intermingling of 0.7.10-1 in the unstable changelog is also broken; > the packages are not descended from each other, the changelog should > not claim that they are. >
@Andreas: Can you please re-upload with that section removed from the changelog? Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
