On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 20.08.2012 11:28, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Thanks. Does this also mean it will be unblocked? Or is this open for
> > discussion?
> 
> It'll need someone to go back over the original discussion and possibly 
> look at the diffs again.  It stands a better chance than with a broken 
> ABI change though. :-)

Apparently someone is me. :-)

 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), po-debconf, bison, autotools-dev, 
  libdb-dev, libexpat1-dev, libical-dev (>=0.43), libldap2-dev, libncurses5-dev,
- libpam0g-dev, libsieve2-dev, libssl-dev, libcitadel-dev (>= 8.11),
- libcurl4-openssl-dev | libcurl3-openssl-dev, zlib1g-dev, libev-dev (>= 4.0), 
libc-ares-dev (>= 1.7.2)
+ libpam0g-dev, libsieve2-dev, libssl-dev, libcitadel-dev (>= 8.14),
+ libcurl4-openssl-dev (>> 7.25), zlib1g-dev, libev-dev (>= 4.0), libc-ares-dev 
(>= 1.7.2)

The libcurl change there doesn't appear to be mentioned in the
changelog.

    Updating webcit introduces new bugs: #682651

You might want to fix that. :-)

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to