Hi, Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 22:40:05 GMT) : > On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:30:14 intrigeri wrote: >> Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 01:16:15 GMT) : >> > There were no reply from maintainer in #688574 so perhaps it would >> > be better to set Daniel as owner of this bug... >> >> Please do it if you feel it's useful.
> Waht would you do? If there was a bug I really wanted to see fixed in Wheezy, I would 1. talk to the maintainer and possibly 2. prepare an upload for t-p-u. >> Given the crash fixed by 4.2.0+20120521-3 has severity normal, >> I'm unsure it's worth the effort. > I'm not sure if "normal" is an adequate severity for crash. I've no idea how far the implications go, so I have no opinion on this matter. I'd like to hear the maintainer's opinion. Daniel, what do you think? (You might want to read #691115 first, to get some context.) > For example "handbrake" (not in testing) was unusable (crashing on > DVD open) with libdvdread prior to 4.2.0+20120521-3. The effects of this bug on a package that is not in testing is hardly relevant to the requested unblock. Please find a more relevant example to illustrate the case :) >> Dmitry, you filed the unblock request that is now outdated, >> what do you think? > We can close it if you think that's the right thing to do. What else > we can do? If it's worth it, going through t-p-u might be an option. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85bodwqsip....@boum.org
