On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 19:07 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 13:08 -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:14:37PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On 12.03.2013 16:00, Debian Queue Viewer wrote: > > > >+spamassassin (3.3.1-1.1) stable; urgency=high > > > > > > "-1.1" seems a slightly odd version number for a maintainer upload. > > > > I went with the version number generated by dch's --security option, > > since it doesn't have an option to generate an s-p-u version and > > security seemed logically closest. Happy to re-upload with something > > else if it matters. [...] > If the upload hadn't been made yet then I'd have suggested 3.3.1-1 > +squeeze1, but I'm not sure it's worth a reject / re-upload cycle just > for that.
I've assumed from the lack of disagreement that you agree. :-) Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
