Hi,

the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds.
Please could somebody from the arm porters look into this?

If I remember correctly we had some issues with the arm soft float port already
with gcc-4.7 and gcc-4.8.  Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would it
better to default to some newer arm version like armv5t?

thanks, Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to