On 13/01/2014, Wookey <[email protected]> wrote: > +++ Matthias Klose [2014-01-13 05:51 +0100]: >> the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf >> succeeds. >> If I remember correctly we had some issues with the arm soft float port >> already >> with gcc-4.7 and gcc-4.8. Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would >> it >> better to default to some newer arm version like armv5t? > > The v4t default is still desired by some people, and no-one has demonstrated > a > speed rom changing to v5, but at some point we expect lack of toolchain > support to force us to move.
The same defect occurs on on armv5t, host, target and build, so that's not a solution. M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAL4-wQrohwYSTqTNJ+xr5z8AfOa0JjZeAz1cum=wcne9hc2...@mail.gmail.com
