+++ Matthias Klose [2014-01-13 05:51 +0100]: > Hi, > > the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds. > Please could somebody from the arm porters look into this? > > If I remember correctly we had some issues with the arm soft float port > already > with gcc-4.7 and gcc-4.8. Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would it > better to default to some newer arm version like armv5t?
The v4t default is still desired by some people, and no-one has demonstrated a speed rom changing to v5, but at some point we expect lack of toolchain support to force us to move. Maybe that point has arrived, or maybe it's a simple patch. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
