Hi, On 08:42, Craig Small wrote: > I thought that: New package goes into SID = no real problem.
That's maybe only true for 'leaf' packages in sid. And anything in experimental. > The frozen set of packages come from testing, not Sid, so as long > as procps wasn't moved from Sid to testing, then it would not > mess up the "don't change libraries" stage we're in now. But the buildd chroots take packages from sid, so a reverse-dependency of procps could pick up a dependency on procps >= 1:3.3.10; then that package then can't migrate unless procps does too. And still, if a reverse-dependency FTBFS because of the procps change, that could delay the transition of some other library. (And yet more packages that were waiting on it to migrate). Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140927225618.gc23...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
