On 2014-11-12 8:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
In the Jessie freeze policy, we instead have:
"translation updates and documentation fixes, via TPU when included
with other
TPU-applicable fixes. (until the 5th of January 2015)"[2]
To me this reads as:
- translation updates and documentation fixes are fine in unstable
until the 5th
of January
- translation updates and documentation fixes are fine in t-p-u until
the 5th of
January, *only* if accompanied by other fixes that meet the t-p-u
criteria
This indeed matches the old description, which was clarified in
42b55359d12ed5c70a53ac041fedaa45b1e729ad.
ftr, I don't believe that it does match the old description, which is
why I clarified it. It's possible that it matches the intent, but that's
another question. :-)
Specifically, if the above is what was intended, then I don't see why
there are two separate items with separate (but identical dates); if
that's the correct interpretation then the first bullet point is
redundant and pointless - i.e. we could simply have had (modulo the typo
from the original draft document):
+ <li>translation updates and documentation fixes, (<b>until FREEZE + 2
mont TODO</b>;
+ <ol>
+ <li>Allowed in TPU when done together with other TPU-applicable
fixes.</li>
+ </ol>
+ </li>
without the second "included with fixes for the above criteria" item.
The wheezy policy had
<li>translation updates and documentation fixes that are included with
fixes
for the above criteria.</li>
<li>translation updates and documentation fixes;</li>
but that made sense because the criteria were dropped from the list of
acceptable changes at different dates. It's possible that introduced
confusion while drafting the jessie policy.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
