Hi Soren, On August 15, 2026 1:57:32 PM CDT, Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> wrote: >Simon, > >Redmine 6.1.3 (currently in unstable) requires html-pipeline 2.x. It is not >compatible with html-pipeline 3.x, which I see you recently uploaded to >unstable. > >Transitioning redmine to html-pipeline 3.x is non-trivial, and upstream >decided to drop it in the redmine 7.x series in favor of loofah. > >https://www.redmine.org/issues/42737 > >What is the feasibility of downgrading html-pipeline in unstable to 2.x so >that we can get redmine into testing? I noticed that autopkgtest was failing >before with 2.x and is still failing with 3.x. I assume you tried upgrading >to the latest version to fix the test failures, but since it is still failing >could we downgrade it and then I can help you work on fixing the test failures >(assuming that is possible).
Yes, I can revert back to 2.x, it just involves downgrading ruby-task-list as well. I can take a look at this tomorrow. That being said, I'd like to explore all options, given the direction upstream is taking. Would it be feasible to cherry-pick the patchset moving to loofah? Otherwise, does Redmine 7 require Rails 8? Do you plan on keeping on Redmine 6.1 for now? It would be good to know when we can go back to 3.x. >P.S. I am CCing the list in case anyone else is working on packages that need >a particular version of html-pipeline. You CCed debian-rust; I assume you meant debian-ruby, so I corrected that. :) Best regards, Simon Quigley [email protected]
