Simon, On Sunday, August 16, 2026 2:22:56 PM Mountain Standard Time Simon Quigley wrote: > Hi Soren, > > On August 15, 2026 1:57:32 PM CDT, Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> wrote: > >Simon, > > > >Redmine 6.1.3 (currently in unstable) requires html-pipeline 2.x. It is not > >compatible with html-pipeline 3.x, which I see you recently uploaded to > >unstable. > > > >Transitioning redmine to html-pipeline 3.x is non-trivial, and upstream > >decided to drop it in the redmine 7.x series in favor of loofah. > > > >https://www.redmine.org/issues/42737 > > > >What is the feasibility of downgrading html-pipeline in unstable to 2.x so > >that we can get redmine into testing? I noticed that autopkgtest was failing > >before with 2.x and is still failing with 3.x. I assume you tried upgrading > >to the latest version to fix the test failures, but since it is still failing > >could we downgrade it and then I can help you work on fixing the test > >failures (assuming that is possible). > > Yes, I can revert back to 2.x, it just involves downgrading ruby-task-list as > well. I can take a look at this tomorrow.
Thank you. Please let me know if you need any help. > That being said, I'd like to explore all options, given the direction upstream > is taking. Would it be feasible to cherry-pick the patchset moving to loofah? It looks like these seven commits are part of the loofah transition: https://github.com/search? q=repo%3Aredmine%2Fredmine+merge%3Afalse+42737&type=commits I haven’t tested it, but I would be surprised if all of these applied cleanly on 6.1. As a general rule, I don’t like to cherry-pick patches this large as they can introduce corner case bugs that are hard to catch. > Otherwise, does Redmine 7 require Rails 8? Do you plan on keeping on Redmine > 6.1 for now? Yes, Redmine 7 requires Rails 8.1. Otherwise, I would just package Redmine 7 now. Do you have any sense of how many things would break if we upgraded Rails to 8.1? > It would be good to know when we can go back to 3.x. > > >P.S. I am CCing the list in case anyone else is working on packages that > >need a particular version of html-pipeline. > > You CCed debian-rust; I assume you meant debian-ruby, so I corrected that. :) Yes, thank you. That was indeed a typo and I meant to send it to debian-ruby. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
