On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 23:51:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > That said, the HDF5 transition seems a bit premature. There are some > fundamental changes which have broken a couple of its reverse-depends, > which is one reason so many packages needed to be removed from testing > in order to transition it. > I'm sorry but I wasn't going to hold testing hostage of hdf5 for much longer than a month...
> In particular, it's impossible to install hdf5-tools and > libhdf5-*mpi-dev at the same time, as is required to build a handful of > reverse-depends [3]. There's no reason the MPI and non-MPI shared libs > should conflict. > Well there's no way they can be installed together as long as they ship the same files, this is not a new issue AFAICT... > [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586149 > And this bug is almost 2 years old, I don't see that it has anything to do with the recent changes? Cheers, Julien -- Julien Cristau <julien.cris...@logilab.fr> Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/ Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120227101513.ga8...@crater2.logilab.fr
