Hello, here my consideration about packages that I know about and that I am maintaining
clipper: libccp4: mmdb: ssm: -> only in experimental. should we put them anyway ? guidata: python-guidata -> false positiv ? is a dependency of guiqwt. Should I add it somewhere ? this is a qt based toolkit used to build scientific applications guiqwt: python-guiqwt -> false positiv ? numericalcomputation:Depends: python-guiqwt viewing:Depends: python-guiqwt mmtk: python-mmtk -> chemistry debian-chem or both ? Description-en: molecular modeling toolkit The Molecular Modeling Toolkit (MMTK) is a library for molecular simulation applications. It provides the most common methods in molecular simulations (molecular dynamics, energy minimization, normal mode analysis) and several force fields used for biomolecules (Amber 94, Amber 99, several elastic network models). MMTK also serves as a code basis that can be easily extended and modified to deal with non-standard situations in molecular simulations. numexpr: python-numexpr, python-numexpr-dbg, python3-numexpr, python3-numexpr-dbg -> dependency of pytables pytables: python-tables, python-tables-dbg, python-tables-doc, python3-tables, python3-tables-dbg -> numericalcomputation ? this package is use to read hdf5 files (python-tables), so it is of general interest. should we add it in other task ? vitables: vitables -> numericalcomputation ? this package provide a qt GUI on top of pytables to explore the containt of hdf5 files. pytango: python-pytango, python3-pytango, python-pytango-doc -> false positiv ? dataacquisition:Suggests: python-pytango, python-taurus qhull: libqhull5, libqhull-dev, libqhull-doc, libqhull-bin -> mathematic-dev ? maybe some geometric task but it is not available ? Description-en: calculate convex hulls and related structures (development files) Qhull computes convex hulls, Delaunay triangulations, halfspace intersections about a point, Voronoi diagrams, furthest-site Delaunay triangulations, and furthest-site Voronoi diagrams. It runs in 2-d, 3-d, 4-d, and higher dimensions. sardana: python-sardana, python-sardana-doc -> false positiv ? dataacquisition:Depends: python-sardana tango: liblog4tango5, liblog4tango5-dbg, liblog4tango5-dev, liblog4tango5-doc, libtango-tools, libtango8, libtango8-dbg, libtango8-dev, libtango8-doc, tango-accesscontrol, tango-accesscontrol-dbg, tango-common, tango-db, tango-db-dbg, tango-starter, tango-starter-dbg, tango-test, tango-test-dbg -> false positiv ? dataacquisition-dev:Depends: libtango8-dev, liblog4tango5-dev dataacquisition:Suggests: tango-db, tango-starter, tango-accesscontrol, python-pytango, python-taurus taurus: python-taurus, python-taurus-doc -> false positiv ? dataacquisition:Suggests: tango-db, tango-starter, tango-accesscontrol, python-pytango, python-taurus so it seems that there is a bunch of false positiv. I imagine that this is because not all binary packages generated for each source package listed are not referenced in the tasks files. In my case, I provide also -doc and -dbg packages in a few of my packages. Maybe we should also provide *-doc ans -dbg taskes files to put these binary packages into. What is your opinion about this ? cheers Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1d6b...@sun-dag2.synchrotron-soleil.fr
