Hi Frederic-Emmanuel, On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 09:45:36AM +0000, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > clipper: > libccp4: > mmdb: > ssm: > -> only in experimental. should we put them anyway ?
Yes, definitely! This is one of the cool features of the Blends framework: You get the advertising (+QA means) for *all* packages - even those only in VCS (and so you should add even those in VCS into the tasks files!!!) but the metapackages will be created on the basis what is actually contained in testing so the resulting set of dependencies will create a valid metapackage that can smoothly migrate to testing. Since you did not mention what task I'll leave this to you and please pretty please add all your stuff in Vcs as well. This has advantages now and will save us later such big changes like now since usually people forget updating the tasks files once a package is really accepted in Debian. > guidata: python-guidata > -> false positiv ? I'd call this as a right positiv since it is actually not in the tasks files. What I meant with false positives are packages where at least one binary package of a source package was mentioned inside the tasks files but the source was part of my list (even if it should not). > is a dependency of guiqwt. Should I add it somewhere ? this is a qt > based toolkit used to build scientific applications Considering the description of python-guidata Description-en: dataset manipulation GUI generator Based on the Qt Python binding module PyQt4, guidata is a Python library generating graphical user interfaces for easy dataset editing and display. It also provides helpers and application development tools for PyQt4. it could be suggested in viewing or I'm even tempted to create a viewing-dev package since we have several packages which are useful to develop some applications that are viewing scientific data. What do you think? > guiqwt: python-guiqwt > -> false positiv ? > > numericalcomputation:Depends: python-guiqwt > viewing:Depends: python-guiqwt Yup, sorry. > mmtk: python-mmtk > -> chemistry debian-chem or both ? > Description-en: molecular modeling toolkit > The Molecular Modeling Toolkit (MMTK) is a library for molecular > ... It's listed in DebiChem tasks. SO I just added (+commited) to chemestry. > numexpr: python-numexpr, python-numexpr-dbg, python3-numexpr, > python3-numexpr-dbg > -> dependency of pytables I think the description rectifies something like: $ git diff diff --git a/tasks/mathematics-dev b/tasks/mathematics-dev index 1b1d44f..9594ea9 100644 --- a/tasks/mathematics-dev +++ b/tasks/mathematics-dev @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ Why: non-free Depends: python-numpy +Depends: python-numexpr | python3-numexpr + Depends: libgsl0-dev Depends: liblapack-dev, libatlas-base-dev, libblas-dev > pytables: python-tables, python-tables-dbg, python-tables-doc, > python3-tables, python3-tables-dbg > -> numericalcomputation ? > > this package is use to read hdf5 files (python-tables), so it is of > general interest. should we add it in other task ? $ git diff diff --git a/tasks/numericalcomputation b/tasks/numericalcomputation index a95a97d..9fdf17e 100644 --- a/tasks/numericalcomputation +++ b/tasks/numericalcomputation @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ Depends: python-scitools Depends: python-deap +Depends: python-tables | python3-tables + Depends: octavede Homepage: http://octavede.sourceforge.net/ Pkg-URL: http://snapshot.debian.org/package/octavede/0.3-1/ > vitables: vitables > -> numericalcomputation ? > > this package provide a qt GUI on top of pytables to explore the > containt of hdf5 files. Added + commited. > pytango: python-pytango, python3-pytango, python-pytango-doc > -> false positiv ? > dataacquisition:Suggests: python-pytango, python-taurus Yep, false positiv. :-( > qhull: libqhull5, libqhull-dev, libqhull-doc, libqhull-bin > -> mathematic-dev ? > maybe some geometric task but it is not available ? > Description-en: calculate convex hulls and related structures (development > files) > Qhull computes convex hulls, Delaunay triangulations, halfspace > intersections about a point, Voronoi diagrams, furthest-site > Delaunay triangulations, and furthest-site Voronoi diagrams. It > runs in 2-d, 3-d, 4-d, and higher dimensions. $ git diff diff --git a/tasks/mathematics b/tasks/mathematics index 61d1525..f66344a 100644 --- a/tasks/mathematics +++ b/tasks/mathematics @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ Depends: julia Suggests: matlab-support +Depends: qhull-bin + X-Removed: Packages removed from Debian Depends: octaviz diff --git a/tasks/mathematics-dev b/tasks/mathematics-dev index 9594ea9..0e08f43 100644 --- a/tasks/mathematics-dev +++ b/tasks/mathematics-dev @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ Why: linear programming Depends: libcgal-dev Why: computational geometry +Depends: libqhull-dev + Depends: libmatheval-dev Depends: python-openopt In the commit log I asked for volunteers to create a geometry task which I personally would consider sensible. > sardana: python-sardana, python-sardana-doc > -> false positiv ? > dataacquisition:Depends: python-sardana Yes, sorry. > tango: liblog4tango5, liblog4tango5-dbg, liblog4tango5-dev, > liblog4tango5-doc, libtango-tools, libtango8, libtango8-dbg, libtango8-dev, > libtango8-doc, tango-accesscontrol, tango-accesscontrol-dbg, tango-common, > tango-db, tango-db-dbg, tango-starter, tango-starter-dbg, tango-test, > tango-test-dbg > -> false positiv ? > dataacquisition-dev:Depends: libtango8-dev, liblog4tango5-dev > dataacquisition:Suggests: tango-db, tango-starter, tango-accesscontrol, > python-pytango, python-taurus Yes, sorry. > taurus: python-taurus, python-taurus-doc > -> false positiv ? > dataacquisition:Suggests: tango-db, tango-starter, tango-accesscontrol, > python-pytango, python-taurus Yes, sorry. > so it seems that there is a bunch of false positiv. I imagine that > this is because not all binary packages generated for each source > package listed are not referenced in the tasks files. No, the problem was a wrong query I did. I totally rewrote the script which is now based on the fact that Blends data are now also kept in UDD. I commited the script to http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=blends/website.git;a=blob;f=misc/sql/0-uncategorised.sh but your recent suggestions are not yet imported (the cron job runs once a day). So you can run this script on alioth and see what uncategorised source packages are remaining (including the resulting binary packages and the latest uploader of the package). I intend to post this update to the list tomorrow (or the day after tomorrow depending how many updates might come today). Please make sure you commit the packages in the beginning (clipper, etc.) into the according tasks. > In my case, I provide also -doc and -dbg packages in a few of my packages. > > Maybe we should also provide *-doc ans -dbg taskes files to put these > binary packages into. What is your opinion about this ? In the very beginning of metapackage creation we had one med-doc package which turned out to be not very practical since we tried to collect every doc there. So we dropped it in Debian Med but if other people think we should provide some foo-doc, bar-doc package that's fine for me. I guess if we see such tasks appearing in Git somebody considered the idea good enough to do the work. ;-) Thanks you very much for your contribution Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
