On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:40:42AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > it belongs in non-US/main since that is where gnupg lives. but since > > its not there its not part of debian. also for it to go into > > non-US/main it must remove its dependency on non-free pgp, and > > exclusivly depend on gnupg. > > It's clear to me we need a virtual package for "pgp implementation" > that both pgp and gnupg can provide. is there anyone sane who actually uses pgp anymore? gnupg is really much better. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
- Re: gnupg problem Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: gnupg problem Peter Cordes
- Re: gnupg problem Petr Cech
- Re: gnupg problem Ethan Benson
- Re: gnupg problem Ethan Benson
- Re: gnupg problem Brett Parker
- Re: gnupg problem J C Lawrence
- Re: gnupg problem Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: gnupg problem Ethan Benson
- Re: gnupg problem Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: gnupg problem Ethan Benson
- Re: gnupg problem Hubert Chan
- Re: gnupg problem Philipp Schulte
- Re: gnupg problem Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: gnupg problem Petr Cech
- Re: gnupg problem Christian Kurz
- Re: gnupg problem Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: gnupg problem Hubert Chan
- Re: gnupg problem Ethan Benson
- Re: gnupg problem Florian Weimer
- Re: gnupg problem Thomas Bushnell, BSG
PGP signature
