Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 04 August 2005 00:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> What is wrong with volatile? It's for exactly this case. > > No it is not. volatile-sloppy [1] may be (if that's implemented). > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/05/msg00016.html
I read that, and I read more importantly volatile.debian.net, and I don't see any indication there of why gaim upgrades (or mozilla ones) are not allowed in volatile. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
