On Thursday 04 August 2005 00:39, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thursday 04 August 2005 00:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> What is wrong with volatile? It's for exactly this case. > > > > No it is not. volatile-sloppy [1] may be (if that's implemented). > > I read that, and I read more importantly volatile.debian.net, and I > don't see any indication there of why gaim upgrades (or mozilla ones) > are not allowed in volatile.
From volatile.debian.net:
volatile is not "just another place" for backports, but should only
contain changes to stable programs that are necessary to keep them
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
functional;
Changes to stable programs <> new upstream versions (in principle).
As a rule, only changes to data files are accepted. Packaging changes are
also not acceptable in principle.
pgpqSnuSRYAdg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
