-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 *sigh*. too late... Typoed the email address. Forward...
- ----- Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:43:30 +0200 From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Latest OOo Etch update -7etch1 depends on different libneon Organization: The Debian Project User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Hi, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > I noticed that the latest OpenOffice.org security update in Etch > (version 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch1, which fixed DSA 1307) depends on libneon25 > whereas the previous Etch version (2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1) depended instead > on libneon26. Are changes in the depended package names, which require > a dist-upgrade, in security updates considered a bug? If so, should I No. Because the change to libneon25 would have been done anywa in etch r1. See -5etch2 in proposed-updates. If you compare to the version which is already approved and accepted for etch1, there's no dependency change.. Actually, -7 was planned to be in etch r1 but as aj doesn't copy it over rom testing.. > bother filing it? No. Normal. Gr??e/Regards, Ren? - -- .''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 - ----- End forwarded message ----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGbzGu+FmQsCSK63MRAu31AJ9xluP2gQQWxSOZBQG17yJVuL3o3QCfUzcs rW/wtcjyG6MyPmeHNNZ1Vmw= =oPX8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
