Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There, I've decided: please name the module xml-sgml-policy
Ok. > Similarly, perhaps the title should be changed to > > Title: Debian XML/SGML Policy > > You decide. Sounds good. > > Any other responses to the '(?)' items? > > Shouldn't the license be the FDL? Seems to me that the FDL is the > documentation counterpart to the GPL. Perhaps. > License: FDL > > You should also add Ardo to the list of contributors, esp given that > he already is one. Ok. > I dunno if there are length constraints, but maybe change the Abstract > to something like: > > Abstract: Subpolicy for Debian packages that provide and/or make > use of SGML or XML resources. > > 'seems a little clearer stated in this way. Your call. Sure. > Yeah, I know. Remember the last round where we tried to get to LSB > compliance - phew! Yes, well, I made it worse by kinda dropping out of sight for a while. > Seriously, though, next week is for bug-fixing and updates, followed > by a few new package uploads. Very high priority for me. I've got my own rather intimidating bug list, plus I seem to be the de facto docbook-dsssl upstream maintainer now, wah. > BTW, why can I no longer get a list of my bug reports via email, as in > > echo "index maint [EMAIL PROTECTED]" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is that service no longer available? I dunno. Have you seen the PTS stuff? You can get really good bug overviews in a tabular form at packages.qa.debian.org. I'll let you know when xml-sgml-policy is stubbed in. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
