On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 01:25:37PM -0600, Mark Johnson wrote:
>
> Shouldn't the license be the FDL? Seems to me that the FDL is the
> documentation counterpart to the GPL.
>
> License: FDL
>
For this and other issues (i.e docbook vs debiandoc) you might want
to read the current draft for the DDP policy available at
www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ddp-policy
Regards
Javi
msg00883/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
