Gregory Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > XML is not SGML, please don't treat it as such. Things like xml-base > and namespaces make XML not SGML. SGML tools will probably choke on XML > data that contains these (data being DTDs, ISO entity files, documents, > and the like). If you're worried about the FHS stuff, bring it up on > the list again. Just before the SGML stuff was added (way back when), > folks on the list realized that XML was evolving to be not SGML, and > agreed that the FHS section on SGML should be SGML explicit. Alas, I > don't think the FHS maintainer actually got the new text to that > effect.
It is a good argument. I'm wavering... I guess the real question is, what would users expect? -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
