On Sunday, January 11, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I was under the impression that we do support stuff under > /usr/share/xml to be symlinked under /usr/share/sgml [...] for > backward compatibility [...], but not the other way around. I was under the same impression. Still am, in fact:) And no more symlinks in /usr/lib/sgml, too. > and to be registered in the SGML catalog system Yep, where appropriate. (E.g. it's not possible to register docbook-xsl in the SGML catalog system.) > > > > It also contains sgml-data 2.0, which registers all provided XML > > materials and also provides the XML catalog DTDs and such. > > > Also, the XML catalog schema is already in xml-core and registered > in the XML catalog system by that package. This should not be done > by sgml-data 2.0. I agree. > Maybe xml-core should also contain (and register???) the other versions of > the XML catalog schema (and symlinking under /usr/share/sgml and registering > in the SGML catalog system). I agree: - xml-core should register the XML Catalog DTD in the SGML catalog system - xml-core should probably provide & register the XML Catalog schema in the other forms (Relax NG & W3C XML Schema). And register the schema via the system identifiers: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/entity/release/1.0/catalog.rng http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/entity/release/1.0/catalog.xsd My $0.02, Mark -- _____________________________________ Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian XML/SGML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/> GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
