Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was under the impression that we do support stuff under /usr/share/xml to be > symlinked under /usr/share/sgml and to be registered in the SGML catalog system > for backward compatibility reasons and what other good reasons one can have but > not the other way around.
Right. > So, why is sgml-data 2.0 registering stuff under /usr/share/sgml in the XML > catalog system (and even without it being symlinked under > /usr/share/xml)? Because I hadn't gotten around to it yet. Working on that now. > Also, the XML catalog schema is already in xml-core and registered in the XML > catalog system by that package. This should not be done by > sgml-data 2.0. Yah, sorry, I'll remove it. I didn't realize it was in there. > Maybe xml-core should also contain (and register???) the other versions of > the XML catalog schema (and symlinking under /usr/share/sgml and registering > in the SGML catalog system). Yes -- if it's going to provide it, it should provide it completely. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.debian.org/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
