Adam Di Carlo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I was under the impression that we do support stuff under /usr/share/xml to be > > symlinked under /usr/share/sgml and to be registered in the SGML catalog system > > for backward compatibility reasons and what other good reasons one can have but > > not the other way around. > > Right. > > > So, why is sgml-data 2.0 registering stuff under /usr/share/sgml in the XML > > catalog system (and even without it being symlinked under > > /usr/share/xml)? > > Because I hadn't gotten around to it yet. Working on that now. > > > Also, the XML catalog schema is already in xml-core and registered in the XML > > catalog system by that package. This should not be done by > > sgml-data 2.0. > > Yah, sorry, I'll remove it. I didn't realize it was in there. > > > Maybe xml-core should also contain (and register???) the other versions of > > the XML catalog schema (and symlinking under /usr/share/sgml and registering > > in the SGML catalog system). > > Yes -- if it's going to provide it, it should provide it completely.
Ok, I'll put them in xml-core. For the symlinking and registration part I'll use what sgml-data 2.0 has as a starting point. Did you get all these from the OASIS website? Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
