Mark Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sunday, January 11, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > It also contains sgml-data 2.0, which registers all provided XML > > materials ... > > Maybe we ought to think about splitting the XML stuff off into an > xml-data package that provides the base infrastructure files. > > Also, should such a package create the following infrastructure > directories under /usr/share/xml/? > > declaration/ > schema/ > entities/ > misc/ > > I bring this last point up because it is left unresolved in the > current XML policy draft[1].
IMHO this should be done by xml-core, since it already installs the XML catalog schema. So, another package (e.g. xml-data) doing this after that fact seems a bit weird to me. It should then also create these directories under /usr/local/share/xml. So, xml-core should provide the base infrastructure for XML (i.e. XML catalog schema, XML catalog system utilities and directory structures). And sgml-base should provide the same for SGML. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
