Ben Collins writes:
> > > PLEASE hardcode it! That's a pretty stiff disadvantage.
> >
> > Done. So each architecture has to decide, which one to use as the default.
>
> How is the default setup?
Default compilers are from the 2.95.3 package.
> With alternatives?
No alternatives are used. That was my understanding of hardcoding.
> Are the alternative priorities set on a per arch basis?
That was my intention to have.
Currently the gcc-2.95.2 package has binaries {c89,gcc,gcov}{,-2.95}.
g++-2.95.2 has binaries g++-2.95 and g++. gcc-2.97 has the gcc-2.97
binary and g++-2.97 the g++-2.97 binary. Both gcc-2.9x and g++-2.9x
packages provide an alternative cc/c++. By using gcc/g++ you get the
default compiler per architecture.
