Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:21:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Source package gcc-defaults, binary-arch packages cpp, gcc, g++ and maybe > > g77, gcj and gpc. For gcc: gcc is a symlink to gcc-x.yz and the > > package provides the alternative cc (pointing to gcc). Will this work? > > What about packages like colorgcc? > > Sounds right to me!
hmm, Is it ok to name these packages cpp, gcc, ... or should it be something like cpp-default, gcc-default, which conflicts/replaces/provides cpp/gcc? The version number of these packages would be a bit misleading. Does it matter?
