Hallo,
Am Freitag, den 20.10.2006, 12:02 +0200 schrieb Werner Mahr:
> Nunmal Butter bei die Fische: GPL oder CDDL oder was anderes. Nicht
> immer drumherum reden.
Ich wollte eigentlich schreiben, dass es CDDL bei allem, was von Joerg
kommt und GPL bei mkisofs ist. Aber in cdrtools-2.01.01a18.tar.bz2 bin
ich auf folgendes gestossen (unter anderem in libscg/scsihelp.c):
/*
* The contents of this file are subject to the terms of the
* Common Development and Distribution License, Version 1.0 only
* (the "License"). You may not use this file except in compliance
* with the License.
*
* See the file CDDL.Schily.txt in this distribution for details.
*
* The following exceptions apply:
* CDDL ยง3.6 needs to be replaced by: "You may create a Larger Work by
* combining Covered Software with other code if all other code is governed by
* the terms of a license that is OSI approved (see www.opensource.org) and
* you may distribute the Larger Work as a single product. In such a case,
* You must make sure the requirements of this License are fulfilled for
* the Covered Software."
*
* When distributing Covered Code, include this CDDL HEADER in each
* file and include the License file CDDL.Schily.txt from this distribution.
*/
Das ist dann wohl die Schily-CDDL.
Der originale Paragraph:
3.6. Larger Works.
You may create a Larger Work by combining Covered Software with
other code not governed by the terms of this License and
distribute the Larger Work as a single product. In such a case,
You must make sure the requirements of this License are
fulfilled for the Covered Software.
Gruss
Thomas
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject "unsubscribe". Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
