>>"E.L. Meijer (Eric)" wrote: >[ ... ] > ... >I always used to think it was me who didn't get it. I customized one >runlevel to run without xdm. I used this runlevel to upgrade XFree86, >so that if anything screwed up, I would not have xdm continously >restarting a bogus X setup. This can be very annoying and very hard to >escape, I know from experience. However, after the configuration >script is done, it starts xdm as if no runlevels exist (I guess it only >checks /etc/X11/config). I agree fully that a proper implementation of >sysvr4 would be a Good Thing.
Ditto. I always wandered why there are all those redundant links in rc?.d dirs, and why I can't easily make a runlevel for xdm I used to have in Slack. -- Dimitri emaziuk at curtin dot edu dot au, if you're replying to ------------------------------- a Usenet posting Avoid reality at all costs. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .