Hi,
>>"Steve" == Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> On Sat, 16 May 1998 10:40:23 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> We are all volunteers here. Generally speaking, constructive
>> criticism is welcome -- unconstructive criticism just makes people
>> leave the project.
Steve> Exactly. I have been giving constructive critism and in return
Steve> I have been getting a flippant attitude of "It isn't that many
Steve> ketstrokes." In fact, one person has said that if the
Steve> situation were reverse he(?)'d find it unacceptable yet is
Steve> asking that I find it acceptable that I must do what he would
Steve> not if things were reversed.
That happens not to be the case. If the reverse were true:
that all packages were held be default, and I had to do two
ops to turn them t be upgraded. I would do it. If I had to release
them one by one, that would be unacceptable.
For gods sake, read before you flame.
manoj
--
The autodecrement is not magical. --Larry Wall in the perl man page
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
