[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Subject:
> 
> debian-user-digest Digest                               Volume 98 : Issue 545
> 
> Today's Topics:
>          Inoperative ls in wu-ftpd-academ
>          Re: older debian release?
>          bo --> hamm upgrade..
>          autofs HOWTO
>          Turtle Beach Montego A3D
>          installing a modem under debian 1.3
>          Problem installing a package with dpkg
>          Re: Problem installing a package with dpkg
>          Re: installing a modem under debian 1.3
>          Re: Samba:  password for mapping network drives
>          Re: installing a modem under debian 1.3
>          Re: postgres intallation failed
>          Re: Problem installing a package with dpkg
>          adding pcmcia module for updated kernel
>          Autoup Upgrade (Was: Re: debian-user-digest Digest V98 #536)
>          Re: installing a modem under debian 1.3
>          anyone have libc6_2.0.7pre1-4.deb (for intel) ?
>          glibc / libc6
>          Re: glibc / libc6
>          Re: glibc / libc6
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Inoperative ls in wu-ftpd-academ
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 12:59:21 -0700 (MST)
> From: Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> In wu-ftpd-academ 2.4.2.16-9 (hamm), I'm not getting any response to an ls
> command with an anonymous connection.  I know there was a bug report on
> an earlier version had included libc5 files in /home/ftp/lib with binaries
> linked with libc6.  With that version, I copied the correct lib files into
> /home/ftp/lib and everything started working again.
> 
> The current installation has the correct lib files reported by ldd, but ls
> still doesn't work.  What is missing this time?
> 
> Bob
> 
> ----
> Bob Nielsen                 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tucson, AZ                  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DM42nh                      http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: older debian release?
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 98 15:31:26 -0500
> From: peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Nelson Posse Lago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> >On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, peter wrote:
> >
> >> hi, i've got what may seem a strange request.. i'm looking for an older
> >> release of debian. i have a laptop w/ only 2MB RAM and i've been told that
> >> one of the older releases of debian will run under 2MB.
> >
> >Try using an older kernel; The 1.2.13 is smaller than 2.0.X, and has
> >support for ELF binaries. With it, I guess debian 1.3.1 should be OK. And
> >you might want to use 1.0.9, smaller still, but I don't know about ELF,
> >maybe you'd have to use debian 0.93R6 which was a.out.
> >
> >Also, you may want to check out http://rsphy1.anu.edu.au/~gpg109/mem.html .
> >
> >I don't know if this address is still valid!
> 
> yes, it's still valid, and not only that, i have everything up and running 
> now!
> the only part that i don't like about it is that i have to download a lot
> of the standard tools and install them manually. it's really easy, of
> course, it's just taking a lot of download time! :)
> 
> thanks to everyone who helped, my laptop is now useful again!
> 
> best,
> peter
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: bo --> hamm upgrade..
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 16:08:33 -0500
> From: Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> I find a lot of small changes, logs moved from (non-existent) /var/adm, to
> /var/logs,
> pppd argument changes, ppp setup changes, etc..
> 
> It took a bit of fiddling to bet the system re-working.
> 
> E.g. pppd now needs a "noauth" argument, files have moved, etc..
> 
> Is there a list of these changes, structural and functional?
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: autofs HOWTO
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 16:10:57 -0500
> From: Paul Serice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user Mailing List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> 
> This message tells how I got autofs to mount floppies so that any member
> of the  "floppy" group would  have read/write permission.  I'm wondering
> if what  I did is  the right approach.  If  so, and if this isn't common
> knowledge (as I couldn't find it), it should be helpful to others.
> 
> The difficulty as    I see is is   that  "mount", when  mounting  "user"
> volumes, by default uses the permissions of the requesting user.
> 
> When the user wants to  mount a volume, it  asks the automount daemon to
> do so.  The automount  daemon in turn  calls "mount", and "mount" gladly
> does it job and mounts the volume with the  permissions of the automount
> daemon, not the  permissions  of  the user.  The   problem is  that  the
> automount daemon  is  started  from the /etc/init.d/autofs   script with
> permissions of   "root.root" and "rwxr_xr_x"  insuring  that no ordinary
> user will be able to write to the floppy.
> 
> To "correct" this, I have carefully  edited the default Debian script to
> change the umask to 002 just before starting the automount daemon.  Then
> I start it with 'sg floppy -c "automount ...  "'.
> 
> Now, when the automount daemon  does it's job, I  see something like the
> following:
> 
>      drwxrwxr-x   2 root     floppy       7168 Dec 31  1969 ./
>      drwxr-xr-x   3 root     floppy          0 Jun 28 08:24 ../
>      -rw-rw-r--   1 root     floppy       9199 Jun 28 08:18 README.TXT
>      -rw-rw-r--   1 root     floppy      25798 Jun 27 23:37 zer0
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul Serice
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Turtle Beach Montego A3D
> Date: 29 Jun 1998 07:33:22 +0900
> From: Yamamoto Hirotaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> Can someone successfully use Turtle Beach Montego A3D
> PCI sound card with Debian2.0beta (hamm)?
> 
> Any help is appreciated!  Thanks.
> 
> --
> Hirotaka Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: installing a modem under debian 1.3
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 18:25:38 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (scott hussey)
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> I am a very novice Linux/Debian user and am trying to setup minicom.  I am
> curious about how to get minicom to recognize my modem. I read in the man
> page that most linux systems have the serial port as /dev/modem or
> /dev/cua#. How can I get Linux to install my modem as a dev. Currently,
> pppd recognizes my modem as ttys2, but minicom gives me the message 'I/O
> Error' when it tries to open ttys2. Any help is greatly appreciated.
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Problem installing a package with dpkg
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 13:43:20 -0500
> From: Katharine Osborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> I'm trying to install the xlib6g package and am
> getting the following error:
> 
> dpkg: error processing xlib6g_3.3.2.2-1.deb
> (--install):
>  trying to overwrite
> '/usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3', which is also in
> package xlib6
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal
> (Broken pipe)
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  xlib6g_3.3.2.2-1.deb
> 
> I've been through all the man/--help pages and I
> have no idea how to fix/avoid this. If you have
> any suggestions, please email me.
> 
> thanks in advance.
> 
> --
> --------------------------------------------
> * Katharine Osborne           515-296-0824 *
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]           Web Developer *
> * "Create like a god, command like a king  *
> * and work like a slave. You have a moral  *
> * imperative to change the world."         *
> *                          -- Guy Kawasaki *
> --------------------------------------------
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: Problem installing a package with dpkg
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 16:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
> From: George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Katharine Osborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, Katharine Osborne wrote:
> 
> >
> > I've been through all the man/--help pages and I
> > have no idea how to fix/avoid this. If you have
> > any suggestions, please email me.
> >
> > thanks in advance.
> 
> Download the package and install it manually with a --force overwrite
> option like this:
> 
> dpkg -i --force overwrite <package.deb>
> 
> And that should do it.
> 
> George Bonser
> 
> Microsoft! Which end of the stick do you want today?
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: installing a modem under debian 1.3
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 19:55:08 -0400 (EDT)
> From: John Kloss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: scott hussey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, scott hussey wrote:
> 
> > I am a very novice Linux/Debian user and am trying to setup minicom.  I am
> > curious about how to get minicom to recognize my modem. I read in the man
> > page that most linux systems have the serial port as /dev/modem or
> > /dev/cua#. How can I get Linux to install my modem as a dev. Currently,
> > pppd recognizes my modem as ttys2, but minicom gives me the message 'I/O
> > Error' when it tries to open ttys2. Any help is greatly appreciated.
> >
> 
> so I'm no expert here, but I certainly had to go through alot to get my modem
> to work with debian (but then, I use a laptop with pcmcia card modem :-) ).
> 
> I think you mean /dev/ttyS2. The serial ports are /dev/ttyS# and equal com 
> port
> numbers minus one (i.e. com1 = /dev/ttyS0, etc). My modem card installs at 
> com2
> so I use /dev/ttyS1. I have been told that /dev/cua# is deprecated and that
> docs using /dev/cua# are out of date (sigh ...).
> 
> I'm pretty sure that /dev/modem is just a symbolic link (at least it is on my
> machine) so to make /dev/modem type
> 
>         ln -s /dev/ttyS2 /dev/modem
> 
> you also need to check to make sure that /dev/ttyS2 is set for the proper irq
> and port # for your modem. read the docs that came with your modem and check 
> to
> see what irq it's expecting to use and what memory address and then type
> 
>         setserial -a /dev/ttyS2
> 
> and see what it says. If not, you can use setserial to change those values
> (read the man pages on setserial), or you can check to see if one of the other
> serial ports is actually the one you want (setserial -a /dev/ttyS0, etc). If
> your modem is internal, debian should be able to detect it on start-up since 
> it
> detects most serial ports on startup but I'm not sure since again I use a
> laptop and usually my modem isn't in one of my card slots on bootup. At any
> rate you can see which ports where detected by typing
> 
>         dmesg
> 
> after startup and logging in. You'll get a list of devices detected at startup
> and other messages too.
> 
> I'm sure someone else here can give you alot more info (probably more accurate
> too), but this is my attempt.
> 
> HTH
> 
>         - John Kloss
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: Samba: password for mapping network drives
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 20:26:59 -0400 (EDT)
> From: dpk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Brian Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Debian User group <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> 
>    Can you help me with that share name thing?  Does that go in the
>    global section?  I've checked the man page for smb.conf, and still
>    couldn't find anything about this parameter.  I've set the
>    workgroup for the appropriate windows workgroup name.  Is this what
>    you were talking about?  I've got the password correct, but now the
>    message comes up "The share name was not found.  Make sure you
>    typed it correctly."
> 
>    Thanks again,
> 
>    Brian
> 
> Adding a share is fairly simple... Say for instance you wanted to
> share out your CDROM which is mounted on your system as '/cdrom', you
> could add this to the bottom of your smb.conf:
> 
> [cdrom]
>   comment = CD-ROM drive
>   path = /cdrom
>   guest ok = no
>   read only = yes
> 
> You can then try mounting the share \\yourhost\cdrom on the Win95 PC.
> There are more options that you can give to a share that are
> documented in the man pages.
> 
> Dennis
> --
> Dennis Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>             |  phone: 353.4844
> Network Admin, College of Engineering, MSU |  pager: 222.5875
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: installing a modem under debian 1.3
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 17:32:38 -0700 (MST)
> From: Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: scott hussey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, scott hussey wrote:
> 
> > I am a very novice Linux/Debian user and am trying to setup minicom.  I am
> > curious about how to get minicom to recognize my modem. I read in the man
> > page that most linux systems have the serial port as /dev/modem or
> > /dev/cua#. How can I get Linux to install my modem as a dev. Currently,
> > pppd recognizes my modem as ttys2, but minicom gives me the message 'I/O
> > Error' when it tries to open ttys2. Any help is greatly appreciated.
> 
> That should be ttyS2, not ttys2.
> 
> ----
> Bob Nielsen                 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tucson, AZ                  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DM42nh                      http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: postgres intallation failed
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 20:10:01 -0500
> From: Jeff Noxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> On Sat, Jun 27, 1998 at 11:14:19AM +0200, Networking Wizard wrote:
> > After Shared PostgreSQL library intsallation (libpgsql 6.3.2-8)
> > i've been trying to inttall postgresql (6.3.2-8) severl times,
> > but i did not succeed; dpkg terminates because of unspecified errors.
> > Here is the log:
> >
> > > Unpacking replacement postgresql ...
> > > Setting up postgresql (6.3.2-8) ...
> > > Now installing the PostgreSQL database files in /var/postgres/data
> > > su - postgres -c 
> > > PATH=/usr/uxs:/root/uxs:/root/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/lib/postgresql/bin:/usr/lib/postgresql/bin;
> > >  initdb -l /usr/lib/postgresql/lib -r /var/postgres/data -u postgres
> > > dpkg: error processing postgresql (--install):
> 
> [snip]
> 
> I think the bug is in base-passwd.
> 
> You need to edit /etc/passwd so that the shell is /bin/sh or similar.  I
> filed a bug report on base-passwd about this.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: Problem installing a package with dpkg
> Date: 28 Jun 1998 22:00:01 -0400
> From: "David Z. Maze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> Katharine Osborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> KO> I'm trying to install the xlib6g package and am
> KO> getting the following error:
> KO>
> KO> dpkg: error processing xlib6g_3.3.2.2-1.deb
> KO> (--install):
> KO>  trying to overwrite
> KO> '/usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6.3', which is also in
> KO> package xlib6
> KO> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal
> KO> (Broken pipe)
> KO> Errors were encountered while processing:
> KO>  xlib6g_3.3.2.2-1.deb
> 
> Hmm...you're upgrading from bo to hamm?  Try installing the xlib6
> package from hamm before installing xlib6g.  The hamm xlib6 packages
> puts the libc5 versions of the X libraries someplace different, so the
> two sets of libraries don't run into each other.
> 
> --
>  _____________________________
> /                             \       "Dad was reading a book called
> |          David Maze         |     _Schroedinger's Kittens_.  Asexual
> |         [EMAIL PROTECTED]       |  reproduction?  Only one cat is in the 
> box."
> | http://donut.mit.edu/dmaze/ |               -- Abra Mitchell
> \_____________________________/
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: adding pcmcia module for updated kernel
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 98 19:34:35 PDT
> From: Tom Kuiper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> I recently installed the 2.0.33 kernel. Now I want to add the pcmcia module,
> which is in a separate package.  This module is already installed for the
> previous version of the kernel, 2.0.30.  I strongly suspect that I cannot just
> create a pointer to /lib/modules/2.0.30/pcmcia in /lib/modules/2.0.33.
> 'dselect' will not let me re-install the pcmcia module because it is already
> installed. I don't want to remove it and re-install it, because then 2.0.30
> wont have a pcmcia module anymore, and I'm not yet ready to trust the new
> kernel completely.  I can think of some work-arounds but I'd like to know if
> there is an approved way around this problem.
> 
> Thanks and regards
> 
> Tom Kuiper
> --
> Internet:       [EMAIL PROTECTED] (137.79.89.31)
> SnailMail:      Jet Propulsion Lab 169-506, Pasadena, CA 91109
> Phone/fax:      (818) 354-5623/8895
> WWW:            http://DSNra.JPL.NASA.gov/~kuiper/
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Autoup Upgrade (Was: Re: debian-user-digest Digest V98 #536)
> Date: 28 Jun 1998 22:53:14 -0400
> From: Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> Hi,
>      During the upgrade, autoup.sh must remove several critical
> packages in order to upgrade them i.e. in bo, perl is one package; in
> hamm perl is provided by perl-base and perl.  The hamm version of perl
> depends on perl-base, but perl-base conflicts with the bo version of
> perl.  Therefore it is necessary to remove the bo version of perl.
> 
>      Since many packages depend upon perl, dpkg must deconfigure these
> packages, then remove perl.  It then installs perl-base and perl in
> sequence and configures the packages that were unconfigured.
> During that process, a number of alarming warning messages are
> generated.
> 
>      If autoup.sh completes normally (displays a message saying you
> now have a libc6 system, and discusses wtmp and utmp), all of these
> warning messages may be ignored.
> 
>      When you enter dselect after autoup finishes, the best course of
> action is to use the access, update and install modules - don't even
> enter the select module.  In that case all packages on your system
> that have an upgraded version (almost all of them) are automatically
> upgraded without any further action on your part.  You are then free
> to use the select function to add any package you might desire.  Most
> development libraries are removed by autoup.sh, and are not
> automatically replaced.   Autoup.sh creates a file
> "removed-<today's_date>" in the current directory recording the
> packages that were removed.  This provides a guide to the packages
> that should be reinstalled with dselect or manually with dpkg -i.
> 
> Bob
> -- _
>   |_)  _  |_       Robert D. Hilliard    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   |_) (_) |_)      Palm City, FL  USA    PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
> 
> Gregory Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I just did an upgrade bo --> hamm using autoup.sh.
> >
> > Amazing. But, there are a number of steps which left me cold; and flipping
> > a coinn for the right action.
> >
> > 1) during the autoup it had seeral "conflicts", adn it was not clear to me
> > if I needed to do anything about them. E.g. I think it tried to remove
> > something that depended on Perl, but I had perl installed, or something...
> >     "dependency problems .. libwww-perl depends on Perl, but perl is not
> > installed.
> >               ...                                      libnet
> >
> > Anyway, there was no clear indication if all was OK, if it was a comment,
> > or if some remedial action was needed (later).,
> >
> > 2) After update, it says "now use dselect to upgrade the rest of your
> > system", then reboot.
> >
> > ?? How do I know what to upgrade? I would like to say; "whatever needs an
> > upgrade, if I have it installed, do it."
> > Instead, I had to go through dselect, look at hundreds of packages, try to
> > remember which I had selected, and decide if they need update. Am I missing
> > something here?
> >
> > Greg Guthrie
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > Dr. Gregory Guthrie
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]         (515)472-1125    Fax: -1103
> >        Computer Science Department
> >        College of Science and Technology
> >        Maharishi University of Management
> >       (Maharishi International University 1971-1995)
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: installing a modem under debian 1.3
> Date: 28 Jun 1998 21:56:49 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> John Kloss writes:
> > I have been told that /dev/cua# is deprecated and that docs using
> > /dev/cua# are out of date...
> 
> Yes.  They will disappear soon.
> 
> > I'm pretty sure that /dev/modem is just a symbolic link..
> 
> Yes.  It's always a symbolic link.
> 
> > so to make /dev/modem type ln -s /dev/ttyS2 /dev/modem
> 
> Better to just use the appropriate device directly.  The link solves
> nothing.
> --
> John Hasler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
> Dancing Horse Hill
> Elmwood, WI
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: anyone have libc6_2.0.7pre1-4.deb (for intel) ?
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 22:17:21 -0500
> From: Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> I'm trying to figure out what broke my rsh and rlogin to user
> root.  If I do "rsh -l root localhost cmd" I get
> 
>    rcmd: localhost: Success
> 
> as output, the cmd never happens, and there's nothing useful in
> the log files.  I just recently upgraded to libc6_2.0.7r-2, so
> I'm suspecting the code in rcmd() code to start.
> 
>    - rick
> 
> --
> Richard Kilgore                     |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Electrical & Computer Engineering   |  http://lore.ece.utexas.edu/~rkilgore/
> The University of Texas at Austin   |  (512) 471-8011
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: glibc / libc6
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 15:16:19 +1200
> From: "Chris Massam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I was wondering if someone could tell me what the difference between
> glibc and libc6 is,
> 
> I've seen a few apps coming out these days written for libc5 or glibc
> , no mention of libc6... is libc6 compatible with glibc.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Chris
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: glibc / libc6
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 23:21:21 -0400 (EDT)
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>(Alex Yukhimets)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Massam)
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was wondering if someone could tell me what the difference between glibc 
> > and libc6 is,
> >
> > I've seen a few apps coming out these days written for libc5 or glibc , no 
> > mention of libc6... is libc6 compatible with glibc.
> 
> libc6 is the name Debian uses for glibc2. They are just different names for
> exactly the same thing.
> 
> Alex Y.
> 
> --
>    _
>  _( )_
> (     (o___           +-------------------------------------------+
>  |      _ 7           |            Alexander Yukhimets            |
>   \    (")            |       http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/      |
>   /     \ \           +-------------------------------------------+
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: glibc / libc6
> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 20:29:22 -0700 (MST)
> From: Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Chris Massam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> 
> On Mon, 29 Jun 1998, Chris Massam wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was wondering if someone could tell me what the difference between glibc 
> > and libc6 is,
> >
> > I've seen a few apps coming out these days written for libc5 or glibc , no 
> > mention of libc6... is libc6 compatible with glibc.
> 
> glibc = Gnu libc = libc6
> 
> >From the GNU Libc FAQ:
> 
> 2.1.    Can I replace the libc on my Linux system with GNU libc?
> 
> {UD} You cannot replace any existing libc for Linux with GNU
> libc.  It is binary incompatible and therefore has a different major
> version.  You can, however, install it alongside your existing libc.
> 
> For Linux there are three major libc versions:
>         libc-4          a.out libc
>         libc-5          original ELF libc
>         libc-6          GNU libc
> 
> You can have any combination of these three installed.  For more
> information consult documentation for shared library handling.  The
> Makefiles of GNU libc will automatically generate the needed symbolic
> links which the linker will use.
> 
> Bob
> 
> ----
> Bob Nielsen                 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tucson, AZ                  AMPRnet:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DM42nh                      http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to