[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Subject: > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 98 : Issue 552 > > Today's Topics: > unsubscribe > Re: How to enable pop3? > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: unsubscribe > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:51:05 -0700 > From: Michael Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Subject: > > > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 98 : Issue > > 550 > > > > Today's Topics: > > unsubscribe > > Linux print server, windows machines > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: unsubscribe > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:10:49 -0700 > > From: Michael Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > Subject: > > > > > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 98 : Issue > > > 548 > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > unsubscribe > > > Re: Where is Netscape? > > > Matrox Millenium G200 > > > Re: Inoperative ls in wu-ftpd-academ > > > Re: anyone have libc6_2.0.7pre1-4.deb (for intel) ? > > > Debian ascentia910N > > > RE: Debian ascentia910N > > > apt and passive ftp > > > compiling argus-1.7.beta.1b > > > hamm upgrade/c++ libraries > > > Re: mailx problem > > > Re: Man + Latex > > > Re: hamm upgrade/c++ libraries > > > Re: adding pcmcia module for updated kernel > > > Re: hamm upgrade/c++ libraries > > > Re: postgres intallation failed > > > Re: Newton connectivity? > > > Re: installing a modem under debian 1.3 > > > Re: Problem installing a package with dpkg > > > How to enable pop3? > > > wu-ftpd hangs in local network > > > Re: Where is Netscape? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: unsubscribe > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 00:59:51 -0700 > > > From: Michael Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > Subject: > > > > > > > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 98 : > > > > Issue 546 > > > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > Re: postgres intallation failed > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: postgres intallation failed > > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 06:29:17 +0200 > > > > From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk> > > > > To: Jeff Noxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > > > > Jeff Noxon wrote: > > > > >On Sat, Jun 27, 1998 at 11:14:19AM +0200, Networking Wizard wrote: > > > > >> After Shared PostgreSQL library intsallation (libpgsql 6.3.2-8) > > > > >> i've been trying to inttall postgresql (6.3.2-8) severl times, > > > > >> but i did not succeed; dpkg terminates because of unspecified > > > > errors. > > > > >> Here is the log: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Unpacking replacement postgresql ... > > > > >> > Setting up postgresql (6.3.2-8) ... > > > > >> > Now installing the PostgreSQL database files in > > > > /var/postgres/data > > > > >> > su - postgres -c > > > > PATH=/usr/uxs:/root/uxs:/root/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/ > > > > > > > > >local/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/lib/postgres > > > > >ql/bin:/usr/lib/postgresql/bin; initdb -l > > > > /usr/lib/postgresql/lib -r /va > > > > >r/postgres/data -u postgres > > > > >> > dpkg: error processing postgresql (--install): > > > > > > > > > >[snip] > > > > > > > > > >I think the bug is in base-passwd. > > > > > > > > > >You need to edit /etc/passwd so that the shell is /bin/sh or > > > > similar. I > > > > >filed a bug report on base-passwd about this. > > > > > > > > The bug is not in base-passwd but in postgresql. I used adduser to > > > > create > > > > the account if it did't exist, but I had not noticed that `adduser > > > > --system' > > > > assigns /bin/false as the shell. I have changed postgresql-6.3.2-11 > > > > to use useradd instead. This is bug#24036. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver > > > > PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1 > > > > ======================================== > > > > "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ; for it > > > > is the power of God unto salvation to every one that > > > > believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek." > > > > Romans 1:16 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > unsubscribe > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: Where is Netscape? > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 01:09:28 +0300 > > > From: Shaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Ed Cogburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > CC: Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > > > > > > > If you want a v4 version, get the v4 version of the .deb installer. > > > > > > Is there a .deb v4 installer for Bo ? It seems to me that the ftp sites > > > are > > > only keeping the one for Hamm ? > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Matrox Millenium G200 > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 09:09:12 +0100 (BST) > > > From: Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Debain User Mailing List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>(Reply > > > requested) > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Does anyone know if the Martox Millenium G200 is compatiable with XFree? > > > Its a > > > new AGP card, and I amd asking if it compatiable before I go out and buy > > > it. > > > If not does anyone know where I could go and find out if it is? > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Graham > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: Inoperative ls in wu-ftpd-academ > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 98 10:26:56 +0200 > > > From: Harald Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > > Am Sun, 28 Jun 1998 schrieb Bob Nielsen: > In wu-ftpd-academ 2.4.2.16-9 > > > (hamm), I'm not getting any response to an ls > command with an anonymous > > > connection. I know there was a bug report on > an earlier version had > > > included libc5 files in /home/ftp/lib with binaries > linked with libc6. > > > With that version, I copied the correct lib files into > /home/ftp/lib > > > and everything started working again. > > The current installation has > > > the correct lib files reported by ldd, but ls > still doesn't wor > > > Try setting the x-bit on the library files in ~ftp/lib. This fixed it for > > > me. (see also bug #22323) --- Harald Schueler Universitaet Essen Tel > > > +49-201-183-2456/2568 Fachbereich 7 Fax +49-201-183-2120 45117 Essen > > > E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > > a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: anyone have libc6_2.0.7pre1-4.deb (for intel) ? > > > Date: 29 Jun 1998 08:54:47 GMT > > > From: Peter Allgeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > > Richard Kilgore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > : I'm trying to figure out what broke my rsh and rlogin to user > > > : root. If I do "rsh -l root localhost cmd" I get > > > > > > : rcmd: localhost: Success > > > > > > : as output, the cmd never happens, and there's nothing useful in > > > : the log files. I just recently upgraded to libc6_2.0.7r-2, so > > > : I'm suspecting the code in rcmd() code to start. > > > > > > It's a bug in rcmd.c in function iruserok. A patch goes out > > > to the maintainer this week hopefully. > > > > > > Ciao ... > > > ... PIT ... > > > > > > -- > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Peter Allgeyer | http://www.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~allgeyer > > > Birkenstr. 10 | _-_ Phone: 0 86 23 / 91 98 25 > > > 84558 Kirchweidach | 0(o_o)0 linux inside ... > > > -----------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---------------------------------- > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Debian ascentia910N > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 12:20:21 +0100 (BST) > > > From: Robert E Steward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Dear All, > > > Has anyone out there tried to install debian on the AST ASCENTIA > > > 910N laptop.I have partitioned the disk, and formated the second partition > > > as DOS. The rescue disk read up until "boot:".Then <ENTER> causes "Loading > > > root.bin...." to be displayed & then it hangs. > > > > > > Any suggestions welcome, not matter how dumb I`ve been. > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Robert Steward > > > > > > Department of Biochemistry > > > Tennis Court Road > > > Cambridge > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: RE: Debian ascentia910N > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 05:51:11 -0600 (MDT) > > > From: Mark Ciciretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Try the tecra boot disks in > > > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/stable/disks-i386/current/special/tecra/ > > > > > > On 29-Jun-98 in Debian ascentia910N Robert E Steward wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > Has anyone out there tried to install debian on the AST ASCENTIA > > > > 910N laptop.I have partitioned the disk, and formated the second > > > > partition > > > > as DOS. The rescue disk read up until "boot:".Then <ENTER> causes > > > > "Loading > > > > root.bin...." to be displayed & then it hangs. > > > > > > > > Any suggestions welcome, not matter how dumb I`ve been. > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Robert Steward > > > > > > > > Department of Biochemistry > > > > Tennis Court Road > > > > Cambridge > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------- > > > E-Mail: Mark Ciciretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: 29-Jun-98 > > > Time: 05:46:43 > > > ---------------------------------- > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: apt and passive ftp > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 08:07:02 -0400 > > > From: Patrick Scott Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: deb-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > > > > > > I have not looked into the underbelly of apt but I assume it is using the > > > ftp protocal. Going on that assumption, can or is it utilizing passive > > > ftp? I have no difficulties at home w/ apt but at work it dies like an > > > ugly beast. My first thought was the passive ftp issue. > > > > > > -- > > > Patrick Scott Pierce > > > MindSpring Enterprises > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: compiling argus-1.7.beta.1b > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 05:20:17 -0700 > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To: Debian <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > > > > > > Has anyone had any luck compiling argus-1.7.beta.1b > > > under hamm? > > > > > > Dan.............. > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: hamm upgrade/c++ libraries > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 08:48:05 -0400 > > > From: Phil Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > > > > > > I upgraded to hamm yesterday and have run into a problem. > > > I used autoup.sh with an ftp connection to get the required packages. > > > Now I cannot compile c++ code, as it cannot find the libs. (iostream.h, > > > fstream.h, string, list, etc). > > > > > > Doing a locate says they are nowhere on the system. Is there a package > > > that I missed? > > > I'm using kernel 2.0.33. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -- > > > Phil Dyer > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > "We should be careful to get out of an experience only the > > > wisdom that is in it-- and stay there, lest we be like the cat > > > that sits down on a hot stove-lid. She will never sit down on > > > a hot stove-lid again-- and that is well; but also she will > > > never sit down on a cold one anymore." > > > Mark Twain, "Following the Equator" > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: mailx problem > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 06:40:19 -0600 > > > From: Gregory Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Loic Prylli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > CC: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > > > > > > Loic, > > > > > > One thing I did recently was upgrade to Hamm using apt-get. Mailx is the > > > only > > > problem I have noticed since then. > > > But now I think in the future I may get other problems since it looks > > > like it > > > is only half-done. > > > > > > When I do a dpkg -l on mialx I get : > > > > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge > > > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > > uppercase=bad) > > > ||/ Name Version Description > > > +++-===============-==============-============================================ > > > > > > ii mailx 8.1.1-3 A simple mail user agent. > > > > > > for libc: > > > > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge > > > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > > uppercase=bad) > > > ||/ Name Version Description > > > +++-===============-==============-============================================ > > > > > > un libc <none> (no description available) > > > > > > for lib6c: > > > > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge > > > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > > uppercase=bad) > > > ||/ Name Version Description > > > +++-===============-==============-============================================ > > > > > > ii libc6 2.0.7r-2 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time > > > files) > > > > > > for libc5: > > > > > > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge > > > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > > > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > > > uppercase=bad) > > > ||/ Name Version Description > > > +++-===============-==============-============================================ > > > > > > ii libc5 5.4.38-1.1 The Linux C library version 5 > > > (run-time lib > > > > > > Loic Prylli wrote: > > > > > > > > I reconfigured my smail, now when I run mailx from the command line I > > > > > have a problem. Example: > > > > > mailx -s "test" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > blah blah blah > > > > > Cc: > > > > > Null message body; hope that's ok > > > > > > > > This symptom has appeared at some point in some hamm releases. Could you > > > > tell precisely which version of mailx you are using? (and your libc > > > > version eventually) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When ever I press return to start a new line, I get the Null message > > > > > body; hope that's ok message. > > > > > Then when I recieve the mail, I have no message body. Is this > > > > > something > > > > > that can be switched in the /etc/smail/config file? > > > > > I have restarted smail several times, but to no avail. > > > > > > > > This would definitely be a bug in mailx, not in smail. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Loic > > > > > > What can be done about this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Gregory Green > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: Man + Latex > > > Date: 29 Jun 1998 15:24:23 +0200 > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Waldemar =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=AFurowski?=) > > > To: Dennis Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > > Dennis Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > On Jens Ritter suggestion, I downloaded the 'sgml-tools' package which > > > > has > > > > the file 'linuxdoc-sgml.sty'. This not working, I renamed the > > > > 'linuxdoc-sgml.sty' file to 'linuxdoc.sty', which also didn't work. > > > > > > Hello, > > > Perhaps you should just make an symbolic link from linuxdoc.sty do > > > linuxdoc-sgml.sty. Do as root: > > > > > > # cd where_linuxdoc-sgml.sty_file_resides_in_TeX_tree > > > # ln -s linuxdoc-sgml.sty linuxdoc.sty > > > > > > Anyway - after you _manually_ changed filename in TeX/LaTeX directory > > > tree, you _have_ to run program texhash, as root: > > > > > > # texhash > > > > > > This will update files, where TeX/LaTeX looks for locations of files. > > > > > > Bilbo > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: hamm upgrade/c++ libraries > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 09:24:21 -0400 (EDT) > > > From: Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Phil Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > CC: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Jun 1998, Phil Dyer wrote: > > > > > > > I upgraded to hamm yesterday and have run into a problem. > > > > I used autoup.sh with an ftp connection to get the required packages. > > > > Now I cannot compile c++ code, as it cannot find the libs. (iostream.h, > > > > fstream.h, string, list, etc). > > > > > > Have you run the rest of the upgrade on your system (i.e. give dselect a > > > run) and have you installed g++ (it split from gcc)? > > > > > > HTH, > > > Brandon > > > > > > --+-- > > > Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Testing Group Status > > > PGP Key: finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bhmit1.home.ml.org/deb/ > > > Dijkstra probably hates me (Linus Torvalds, in kernel/sched.c) > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: adding pcmcia module for updated kernel > > > Date: 29 Jun 1998 07:48:37 -0600 > > > From: "Gary L. Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > > In a message Tom Kuiper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > | I recently installed the 2.0.33 kernel. Now I want to add the pcmcia > > > | module, which is in a separate package. This module is already > > > | installed for the previous version of the kernel, 2.0.30. I strongly > > > | suspect that I cannot just create a pointer to > > > | /lib/modules/2.0.30/pcmcia in /lib/modules/2.0.33. 'dselect' will not > > > | let me re-install the pcmcia module because it is already installed. I > > > | don't want to remove it and re-install it, because then 2.0.30 wont > > > | have a pcmcia module anymore, and I'm not yet ready to trust the new > > > | kernel completely. I can think of some work-arounds but I'd like to > > > | know if there is an approved way around this problem. > > > > > > How did you install the new kernel? Did you install the kernel image > > > kernel-image-2.0.33_<version>.deb file or did you install the kernel > > > source *.deb file and build a custom kernel? For the first case all > > > the relevent modules are contained within the pcmcia-modules-<kernel > > > version>*.deb file. In the later case you need to install > > > pcmcia-source file and use the make-kpkg Debian utility. > > > > > > So, in summary, if you're using Debian 2.0 Beta (similiar for 1.3.x) > > > and you installed kernel-image-2.0.33_2.0.33-9.deb, then install > > > pcmcia-modules-2.0.33_3.0.0-8k9.deb and you should be all set. The > > > pcmcia-modules*.deb file you need to install for the 2.0.33 kernel > > > should have a different version than the one you installed for 2.0.30 > > > and so there shouldn't be a problem with dselect. You can always get > > > the *.deb file manually and use "dpkg -i" on it. This will, I believe, > > > uninstall the previous version and then install the new one, whether > > > they're the same version or not. > > > > > > If you installed the source file kernel-source-2.0.33_2.0.33-9.deb > > > then install pcmcia-source_3.0.0-8.deb and take the following steps: > > > > > > cd /usr/src/linux > > > make xconfig OR make menuconfig OR make config > > > make-kpkg --revision <custom kern revision number> kernel_image > > > (and maybe, can't recall for sure) > > > make-kpkg --revision <custom kern revision number> modules_image > > > > > > If you're doing this then take a look at /usr/doc/pcmcia. It has a > > > step by step procedure for installing the PCMCIA stuff from source > > > that I'm sure is more accurate than my memory. > > > > > > Good Luck! > > > Gary > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: hamm upgrade/c++ libraries > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:08:09 -0400 > > > From: dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > CC: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > > > > > > Brandon Mitchell wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 29 Jun 1998, Phil Dyer wrote: > > > > > > > > > I upgraded to hamm yesterday and have run into a problem. > > > > > I used autoup.sh with an ftp connection to get the required packages. > > > > > Now I cannot compile c++ code, as it cannot find the libs. > > > > > (iostream.h, > > > > > fstream.h, string, list, etc). > > > > > > > > Have you run the rest of the upgrade on your system (i.e. give dselect a > > > > run) and have you installed g++ (it split from gcc)? > > > > > > I have installed g++2.90.29, but have not run dselect for the rest of the > > > packages yet. Just seems strange that the gcc and g++ are the only things > > > complete, and the only things (I think) that are broken. > > > > > > I'll try dselct and complete before I whine any more... > > > > > > Phil Dyer > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > Brandon > > > > > > > > --+-- > > > > Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Testing Group Status > > > > PGP Key: finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bhmit1.home.ml.org/deb/ > > > > Dijkstra probably hates me (Linus Torvalds, in kernel/sched.c) > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: postgres intallation failed > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 09:03:51 -0500 > > > From: Jeff Noxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> > > > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 1998 at 06:29:17AM +0200, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > > > The bug is not in base-passwd but in postgresql. I used adduser to > > > > create > > > > the account if it did't exist, but I had not noticed that `adduser > > > > --system' > > > > assigns /bin/false as the shell. I have changed postgresql-6.3.2-11 > > > > to use useradd instead. This is bug#24036. > > > > > > If you don't use --system, will the uid still be <1000? And shouldn't > > > this > > > uid be consistent across multiple Debian installations? > > > > > > Has someone already closed the base-passwd bug, or should I? > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: Newton connectivity? > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 09:24:37 -0500 > > > From: Ted Cabeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carl Fink) > > > CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > > > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carl Fink writes: > > > >Does anyone have any suggestions (or FAQ pointers) for someone using a > > > >Newton MessagePad 2100 with Debian Linux? I have been offered a > > > >really good deal on one (next thing to free). > > > > > > > >I currently have a Bo system because I'm waiting for official CDs to > > > >upgrade to Hamm. I've found a bunch of good Newton web pages, but > > > >nothing specific to Linux-Newton relationships. > > > > > > Theres a program called newtonlink, which I don't have the URL for on me, > > > that does unix<->newton stuff. You'll need a program called sloup > > > installed on your newt, but it should work fine. Congratulations on > > > getting > > > a newt, I love mine. > > > > > > -- > > > Ted Cabeen http://fnord.rh.uchicago.edu [EMAIL > > > PROTECTED] > > > Check Website or finger for PGP Public Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > "I have taken all knowledge to be my province." -F. Bacon [EMAIL > > > PROTECTED] > > > "Human kind cannot bear very much reality."-T.S.Eliot [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Subject: Re: installing a modem under debian 1.3 > > > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 10:47:04 -0500 > > > From: Ed Cogburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Debian Users <debian-user@lists.debian.org> > > > > > > scott hussey wrote: > > > > > > > > I am a very novice Linux/Debian user and am trying to setup minicom. I > > > > am > > > > curious about how to get minicom to recognize my modem. I read in the > > > > man > > > > page that most linux systems have the serial port as /dev/modem or > > > > /dev/cua#. How can I get Linux to install my modem as a dev. Currently, > > > > pppd recognizes my modem as ttys2, but minicom gives me the message 'I/O > > > > Error' when it tries to open ttys2. Any help is greatly appreciated. > >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]