On 6 Nov 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote: : : >> "A" == AJT60 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : A> On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Martin Bialasinski wrote: : : >> M$ had confirmed, that this document is a M$ memo. See slashdot for : >> the pointer. : : A> Also, it's unlikely that this was deliberatly "leaked" by microsoft : A> (IMHO), because it's not exactly good publicity for them. Far more PR : : I have not finished the Halloween II document, but the key quotes : alone make me think that *this* one was leaked by M$ because of the : DOJ case to show that there is immense competition and M$ doesn't have : a monopol.
This is an excellent point ... I hadn't thought about it in those terms. I still find your scenario doubtful, but not impossible ... : This one is so positiv, if managers would read it, they would kick NT : at once. So? OS/2 Warp Server and Novell have at times been compared most favorably to NT (read, they kicked NT's butt) and people still flocked to NT :) Never assume that people, especially management, are rational. -- Nathan Norman MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.midco.net finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP Key: (0xA33B86E9)
