Well I have to say that setting up ppp in debian was the easyist, of all the Linux distros and any other OS I have installed.
*--* Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *--* Voice: 425.739.4247 *--* Fax: 425.827.9577 *--* HTTP://www.otak-k.com/~lawrence/ -------------------------------------- - - - - - - O t a k i n c . - - - - - On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Steve Lamb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:52:46 -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > >> I think these criticisms are overstated in many cases. Ever try to get > >> ppp running on Solaris? I have installed many distributions. The initial > >> install is only a portion of the problem. The rest comes in getting the > >> system configured the way that you need it. That is where Debian excels. > > >Yes, I have gotten Solaris's PPP configured and, yes it did suck > >royally. But that's not the point, Debian does have short comings, and > >poeple are aware of them. No matter how much they overstated it, we > >need to address these issues. > > I personally don't think that the PPP setup needs work. I found it > quite simple. So simple that the first time I set up Debian I missed it and > feel like a complete putz. > > Windows PPP setup is harder because it is in several different and > non-obvious places. Sure, Debian may have problems, but this isn't one of > them. > > - -- > Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your > ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. > - > -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc > > iQA/AwUBNuQ9gnpf7K2LbpnFEQIL0QCfe3wchfP4+wTeVSx6FEo4nk7YUGwAn0Cj > N1LV3Mtqo1PHoAAZuDpQ5zTf > =orQE > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > >
