On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:58:23PM -0500, Gary Turner wrote: | On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:04:40 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | | >On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 01:29:04PM +1000, John wrote: | <snip> | >Nonetheless, the DSA says it affects 64-bit architectures. It sounds | >like if you're not using a 64-bit system (eg SPARC or ia64) then you | >aren't vulnerable. | | From Linux Weekly News http://lwn.net 6/20/02 | | "Note also that an exploit for 32-bit systems has been posted. It was | originally stated that 32-bit systems were not vulnerable to | remote exploits, but that claim has been demonstrated to be false. Given | the nature of this vulnerability, anybody running an Apache | server should upgrade sooner rather than later."
Thanks all for the correct details. Isn't it great when the fix is
released *before* the worm?
-D
--
Folly delights a man who lacks judgement,
but a man of understanding keeps a straight course.
Proverbs 15:21
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/
pgpamcOly3657.pgp
Description: PGP signature
