2009/4/9 Sven Hoexter <s...@timegate.de>: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:03:18PM +0100, Paul Richards wrote: > >> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464962 >> > >> > Turns out the AMD Geode LX is affected by the same problem, and there >> > is already a fix in the pipeline. >> > >> >> >> I've just taken a fresh look at this to see if I'm now able to move >> back to a normal 686 kernel, but I see that the fixed version >> "2.6.26-8" is not available on Lenny. Currently Lenny still has >> "2.6.26-1". >> >> Is there any chance this will become available on Lenny eventually? > > Hm currently there's -13 with -13lenny2 scheduled for the next stable > release available for Lenny. > > s...@arthur:~$ rmadison linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 > linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 | 2.6.26-13 | stable | i386 > linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 | 2.6.26-13 | testing | i386 > linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 | 2.6.26-13lenny2 | proposed-updates | i386 > > If you've still something older than that you should check your system and > maybe the mirror why this is the case.
I don't have proposed-updates in my sources.list. Is it advisable to add proposed-updates for a stable system? > > Personally I decided to run my Geode LX system with the 486 kernel image. > Donno how much of a performance penalty there is but I guess for usual > system usage it doesn't matter. > Likewise, I can't imagine that it makes a significant difference. It would just make my Geode system sound more powerful if the login message splurted "686" instead of "486".. :) -- Paul Richards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org