On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:39:53AM +0800, 明覺 wrote: > 2009/6/23 Hal Vaughan <h...@halblog.com>: > > [...] > > Boy, I didn't realize that by "junior programmer" you meant you were that > > inexperienced in the field. I don't know if you realize that you've just > > basically said you are either unwilling or unable to understand the > > different reasons for different languages. > > > > EACH language is a tool, and each one is a DIFFERENT tool with a DIFFERENT > > purpose. > I will give an example to deny your opinion - "a DIFFERENT tool with a > DIFFERENT purpose" > Sql is a language for database operation, but what microsoft doing is > to use C# replacing sql, by linq. I don't like microsoft, but I like > the way they developing C#, the only one language for microsoft will > be C#, I guess. Then what's the only one language for linux? I think > it's C/C++.
Oh boy, I call BS! linq by no means replaces sql. It maybe a layer on top of (also) sql. But even the .NET (NOT c#!!) is not coherent. An MS does not gravitate only to c#. [...] -- Henning Follmann | hfollm...@itcfollmann.com it consultant | www.itcfollmann.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
