In <4a5f556b.8090...@gmx.net>, Dirk wrote: >Jeff Soules wrote: >>> HAL is not "technology moving forward". >>> >>> It is a project dedicated to taking away the right to do what you want. >> >> I'm sorry, your argument is "HAL hates freedom?" Seriously? You >> believe there is an entire team of malicious devs who've devoted their >> weekends to oppressing your choice of mouse buttons? >> >It takes away my right to do what I want. And it does so because its >installation is enforced per dependency.
HAL itself doesn't do that. The package maintainers for the X.org package in Debian do that. I don't think that they "hate freedom", but rather that they may be making the wrong decision for the right reasons. (They would like Linux to be easy AND flexible.) -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
