On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:27:42PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:41:54PM +0100, Martin Kraus wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:58:43PM -0600, Mark Allums wrote: > > > Earlier, I wrote what I think was a confusing reply to this. > > In Debian > > Squeeze, there are two packages for qemu, one named qemu, the other > > qemu-kvm. > > Both are based on version 0.11.1 of qemu and both supposedly support kvm. > > Wll at one point, yes but > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kvm.html > [2009-12-31] kvm REMOVED from testing (Britney) > > > My question is, why there are two apparently identical qemu packages. Which > > one should I use with kvm. > > Your answer is ..... qemu-kvm > This is stable release of kvm. > http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qemu-kvm.html > http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/qemu-kvm > See /usr/share/doc/qemu-kvm/README.Debian for more information.
>From what I've read the plan is to merge back into qemu instead of having a separate fork. I've found for example grub-firmware-qemu package, which works with qemu but I haven't been able to get it to start with qemu-kvm. If both I functionaly equivalent, I'd prefer to use qemu as the primary development of virtio etc will go probably in there, since it's not kvm specific. mk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100308134550.gd20...@finrod
