On 5/18/2010 10:34 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:07:10AM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
>> Thank you. This is contrary to what the main Debian site says in >> multiple places, but it is plausible. Good to know. > > Could you be more specific where you saw them or where you got this > impression? So we can make corrective action to reduce confusion. http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages This area contains the most recent packages in Debian. Once a package has met our criterion for stability and quality of packaging, it will be included in testing. unstable is also not supported by the security team. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch2.en.html#s2.3 2.3 How does Debian handle security? . . . Information regarding security is centralized in a single point, http://security.debian.org/. http://www.debian.org/security/faq#unstable Q: How is security handled for unstable? A: The short answer is: it's not. Unstable is a rapidly moving target and the security team does not have the resources needed to properly support it. If you want to have a secure (and stable) server you are strongly encouraged to stay with stable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bf2e8b0.6030...@allums.com
