Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:05:10 +0100, Rémi Letot wrote: > >> I just updated a bunch of servers from etch to squeeze (yes I know, took >> my time :-) > > And I still worried because I have to keep lenny... :-P
lol :-) > > Did you run an in-place update or did you install squeeze from > scratch? in-place update, and I had to ressort to the equivallent of a software chainsaw several times to make it work :-) >> Everything works fine after a bit of tweaking, except printing. I have a >> networked postscript printer managed through cups, and since the upgrade >> it has been dead slow. > > (...) > > Okay, as a first round I would try to debug if the origin of the slowness > is related to the network connection. I don't think so, my network has no problem otherwise. Besides, the file that I print is very small. It's only one page, some KB. The number of pages comes from using lp -n . > Is printing pain slow when printing from the local host (the computer > that is connected to the printer) or you note some difference in the > processing speed when sending the job locally? I have no locally connected computer, it's only a network printer. So no easy way to test this. > And just in case, if the printer supports it, I would test with a PCL6 > driver, it would be interesting to see the results to compare. Will try that tomorrow. > Also, the more information you provide for the printer (brand name, > model, connection type, ppd file in use...), the better. Brother HL-4050CDN, network connection, ipp protocol, ps filter. The ppd is the one provided with cups, and I also tried with the generic ps ppd. I force reinstalled the whole cups stack (cups and co, foomatic,...) just to be sure that no etch file was lying around, but it didn't help. Thanks, -- Rémi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87booe6a6w....@poukram.net